Then we have the rear LCD monitor, and I would like to start by showing you how ugly the one on my old A7R II looks today. However in my stress test using the FE 55mm f/1.8 (5-axis on the sensor), I didn’t come across a substantial difference. Looking for a Sony A7R III vs Sony A7S III comparison? In this case, both Sony A7R III and Sony A7R II have the same Sony E lens mount so have 126 native lenses available. One advantage of the A7R III is that you can configure the buttons differently for stills, movies and playback mode. We also find two custom buttons on top next to the exposure compensation and mode dials. The A7R III gives you warmer results when using the auto white balance. 25600 is usable but after that noise becomes really invasive. Then we have face and eye detection. On the other hand, with a thickness of 74mm, it is 14mm thicker. When processing the RAW file, you can quite easily match the results, although I admit that for this particular example, the A7R III file required a few extra adjustments to suit my taste. Thank you! Here are some of the most popular Sony E Mount Lenses on Camera Decision: You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Sony A7R III and Sony A7R II, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. The same conclusion applies to the SOOC JPGs and DRO (Dynamic Range Optimiser) set to the maximum level of 5. While a7R III’s -3 EV metering sensitivity is one stop better when shooting wide open, a99 II rules when shooting stopped down in low-light. The A7R III is more recent and as a result still has its original retail price of $3200 / £3200 / €3500. Sample images and additional content. Concerning the tech specs, the resolution of the A7R III screen is slightly higher (1.44M vs 1.23M) but the real update is touch sensitivity, something that the A7R II lacks. That being said, the A7R III footage appears a little sharper than the mark II model, although moiré can also be more visible as a result. Sony A7R III has external dimensions of 127 x 96 x 74 mm (5 x 3.78 x 2.91″) and weighs 657 g (1.45 lb / 23.17 oz) (including batteries). You can switch between PAL and NTSC modes but be aware that this often requires you to format your SD card. Rolling shutter is very similar in full frame mode, but is visibly more contained in Super35 mode on the A7R III. But if you are hoping to save some pennies – perhaps to invest in a good lens – then the A7R II remains an excellent choice. When using the single points (central, flexible or expanded flexible) both cameras prioritise contrast detection and you can see the “breathing” of the lens going back and forth to acquire focus. The A7R III gains 1/3 of a stop in native ISO sensitivity: it goes from 100 to 32000 whereas the A7R mark II stops at 25600. However the cameras don’t use the entire 42MP but instead perform pixel binning. The same scene captured in the evening and purposely overexposed by 5 stops shows that both cameras generate lots of noise when recovering the exposure in post production, but the A7R II loses more colour information. Hopefully Sony will fix this problem with another update. Sony a7R II Alpha Full Frame Mirrorless Camera with FE 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Lens - Bundle with Camera Case, 128GB SDXC U3 Memory Card, 55mm Filter Kit, … So what’s left to look at? If you are new to the Sony system and are looking to buy an a7R, the MkIII is the obvious choice despite its higher price tag thanks to the extra burst rate speed, increased focus points, extended dynamic range and upgrades to video specifications. If you are already familiar with E-mount cameras, however, you will certainly appreciate the improvements made to the new camera. Plus there is a setting called Auto Power Off Temp that, just like on the a6300/a6500, allows the camera to continue the recording if the body temperature gets warmer than normal. You can choose to record using the entire sensor width (full frame) or select the Super35/APS-C mode. Vamos a hacer la comparativa Sony A7R III vs Sony A7R IV, dos cámaras Sony Full Frame de gama profesional. You can read more about this topic on Lonely Speck. Sony A7R II has external dimensions of 127 x 96 x 60 mm (5 x 3.78 x 2.36″) and weighs 625 g (1.38 lb / 22.05 oz) (including batteries). It can take some time to find the optimal configuration but once you do, the A7r III becomes very quick and easy to operate, and that’s one of the main differences you will notice in the long run when comparing it with the previous model. With the Low and Standard level however, it is the older A7R II that shows more noise. Enter your email and click the blue button below to open the subscription form. The increased resolution is what surprised me the most – not just the sharpness of the OLED panel itself, but also how much easier it is to manually focus. To learn more about the viewfinder and display settings of your Sony A7 camera, check out the guide below. The A7R II retains an advantage however: it is compatible with the PlayMemories apps that you can download and install to add extra functionalities such as Time-Lapse, Digital Filter etc. Where mirrorless cameras go head-to-head! Sony A7 III: 10fps with AF/AE tracking (or 8fps in live view mode). There are 10 custom buttons on both cameras plus the wheel rotation, but the A7R III lets you configure the AF Joystick as well (when pressed). Video12. Despite the compact size, the buttons are well-organised and easy to reach. Both the A7R IV and the A7S III are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are equipped with a full frame sensor. Sony has developed a reputation for rapid development cycles, and since they all look basically the same, it can be hard to figure out the differences between its … You can also use off-camera flashes made by Sony or compatible third-party units. Sony A7R IV vs A7S III. Setting it to -2 can decrease the chance of the camera refocusing on an obstacle passing between you and the subject. At the time of its release, it represented a significant step forward for multiple reasons: it was the camera with the highest concentration of phase detection points, it took features like Eye detection to another level, and it introduced compatibility with DSLR lenses. The difference in colour rendering is similar to what we saw with the SOOC JPGs: the A7R III has a warmer rendering, which gives it more character especially for landscapes. Where I found the new camera to be more reactive and accurate than the A7R II was when working in less light with slow lenses. Sony a7R III focuses stopped down, a99 II focuses wide open. Both modes can be accessed via on the main dial on the A7R II. The advantage of the full frame mode is that you can keep the native field of view of your full frame lens. Viewfinder and LCD monitor7. (more at High ISOs) Top Sample Images Intro Lenses & Adapters Specifications Accessories USA Version Performance Compared Usage Recommendations More I'd get my A7R III at Adorama, at Amazon, at B&H or at Crutchfield, or get it used if you know How to Win at eBay. The Sony A7R mark II is probably the mirrorless camera I’ve used more than any other since I began reviewing photography gear five years ago. The percentage indication next to the battery icon disappears as well. The A7S II has bigger pixels. If we take into account all the other aspects however, we soon realise that things aren’t as black and white as they seem. If you don’t fancy using the AF Joystick, you can use the LCD screen to move the AF point when composing with the viewfinder. Since both Sony A7R III and Sony A7R II have the same Sony E lens mount and Full frame sized sensors, lenses will not be a differentiator on total size of the system. Portrait and Eye AF Settings for Sony A7 / A9, Sony A7R II vs A7s II – The complete comparison, Sony A7R III vs A9 – Five key aspects analysed, Sony A7R III vs Fujifilm GFX-50S – Image quality comparison, Sony A7 III vs A7R III – The complete comparison, Gamma Display Assist when shooting with S-Log2/S-Log3 or HLG, the possibility to use the shutter release button to start/stop the recording, the possibility to configure the custom buttons differently for stills and video, the Sunny Weather option that boost the brightness of the LCD screen remains active during 4K recording, you mainly care about the quality of the sensor and want to save some money, you’re fine working in APS-C mode for video, you want a more complete product in terms of design and ease of use, you plan to use a lot of manual focus lenses and can take advantage of the superior viewfinder, you want better quality in full frame mode for video, astro-photography is your favourite genre. As you can see, A7R II is 2 years older than A7R III. Well, the answer is “no” if your main concern is image quality. I’m not sure if the company is planning to re-structure the whole concept or if they will simply abandon it, but right now the situation is worse because you can’t access these features at all. Sony A7 III has the same height and width with Sony A7R II. Article Updates2. In Full HD, it’s 50Mbps unless you choose the AVCHD option which drops down to 24Mbps or 17Mbps depending on your settings. More crucially, though the A7R III’s AF system is claimed to acquire focus in about half the time taken by the A7R II’s in low-light and tracking is two-times more accurate. Sony A7R III vs Sony A7R II COMPARISON SELECTION (3 selected items max.) Design and Build Quality4. Of course there are some limitations to this technology: since it involves four images captured one after the other with a minimum interval of 1 second, any moving elements like a person walking into the scene will result in ghost artefacts. Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Sony A7R III and Sony A7R II compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you. You may also be interested in these comparisons: Sony Alpha A7R IV vs Sony Alpha A7R III Sony Alpha A7R IV vs Sony Alpha A7R II. Landscape … The A7R III gave me better results but the performance was less consistent between each burst, even with the same settings. Many users have been asking for a solution and third-party brands have also begun adopting it as well. On the mark II, you need to select 720p to get more frame rates but the quality isn’t great. The Sony Alpha A7R II and the Sony Alpha A7R III are two enthusiast cameras that were announced, respectively, in June 2015 and October 2017. When using the electronic shutter, you can encounter distortion and banding but the mark III has a faster sensor readout that improves the results a little. Autofocus9. This is another welcome improvement that allows you to do a number of things such as assign JPG and RAW files or still and video files to two separate cards. You can see our video comparison in 4K between the two cameras below. The difference in colour rendering carries over to skin tones as well, although it can be more subtle depending on your settings. Shoot Set). The buffer capabilities have also been improved. So while the improvement in image quality is interesting, the practical limitations mean that this feature is only useful for still life, or landscape / architecture as long as there aren’t any moving elements in the frame. Sensor shift11. Below you can see the front view size comparison of Sony A7 III and Sony A7R II. Both products feature a full frame/35mm sensor with 42.4MP, no AA filter and BSI (Back-Illuminated) technology. Battery life14. I admit I didn’t have the best lens for this (FE 55mm) but it gave me an initial hint about the performance. We take a look at how these two cameras stack up against one another. To learn how to customise your Sony Alpha A7 camera, check out dedicated guide below. The 3.0 C-Type can be used to re-charge the battery while the camera is in operation, even if you connect another accessory (e.g. DXOMARK Sensor Scores: Overall Score . Compare Nikon Z6 (24.5MP) vs. Sony Alpha a7R III (42.4MP) on sensor size (43.13mm vs. 43.18mm diagonal), pixel pitch, pixel density and other specs. Flash and extra features13. A7R III's built-in Image stabilization system is effective to compensate vibration up to 5.0-stops according to CIPA standards whereas A7R II's IS system is rated upto 4.5-stops. It has an excellent tactile feel and is precise to use, albeit a little slower than I would like. However the colour cast can be minimised with post processing so we’re talking about a minor difference in this case. In Super 35 mode, the mk3 model has a slight advantage as well but it is less evident. Sony's a7-series marked the debut of full-frame mirrorless, and Sony still dominates this market with its a7S II, a7 II and a7R II. Guide:LCD and EVF Settings for Sony A7 / A9. However the A7R III has two USB ports, one Micro 2.0 and one 3.0 C-Type. The latter is the answer to a technical limitation where the traditional infrared beam of a flash doesn’t work with the on-sensor phase detection points. Looking for a Sony A7S II vs Sony A7R III comparison? Sony doesn’t spoil its customers as much as other mirrorless competitors when it comes to extra features. Now, whenever a new camera model replaces an older one, there is almost always a relevant difference in price and such is the case with the A7r II and A7r III. Sony a7R II Alpha Full Frame Mirrorless Camera with FE 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Lens - Bundle with Camera Case, 128GB SDXC U3 Memory Card, 55mm Filter Kit, … Of course you also have more chances to find a good price second hand. Sony A7 III vs A7R III vs A7S II: burst shooting (fps) The A7R III's sensor may make it seem like a less obvious choice for burst shooting, but 10fps capabilities and a wide-area Hybrid AF system make it a strong option. Other customisation options include the 12-slot Fn menu that can be configured as you wish, and the memory recalls (two on the mk2, three on the mk3) that you can select from the main dial on top. There are other small changes concerning the buttons and dials. This means that it is easier to track fast moving subjects or anticipate a movement with the mk3 thanks to the live view. Speaking of the sensor shift mechanism, the A7R mark III can use this technology for another purpose: Pixel Shift Multi Shoot. You need to pixel peep to see the difference but it is there. And if you are looking for high-end still and video quality in a mirrorless camera, the A7R III is also a more than relevant candidate. The a7R II and the a7 III are full frame Sony bodies separated by several years of upgrades. Whereas the A7R II can manage a maximum of 5fps, the A7R III goes up to 10fps with AF/AE Tracking. The mark III benefits from further improvements to the continuous autofocus: it does a better job of keeping a fast moving subject in focus, and face detection is more reactive and precise as well. I don’t think the camera needs to be much bigger but increasing the dimensions ever so slightly could significantly improve the handling. The Sony Alpha A7R IV and the Sony Alpha 7S III are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in July 2019 and July 2020. Although the one on the A7R III is slightly larger and taller than the one on the mark II model, I still find it too small when using large lenses such as the FE 24-70mm f/2.8 or the FE 100-400mm GM, in part because all the weight rests on your middle finger. The only flaw is the same I already highlighted in my A7R III vs A9 comparison: the grip. It really takes a more extreme example to reveal some differences that favour the new camera. They also toned down the saturation of the Vivid style so that it now appears more natural. Sony also says that the EY AF is 2x more effective and it’s available on the A7R III with Sony A-mount lens mounted via an adaptor. 0. The sharpest result I got with the A7R III was at 1/4 of a second, but at that speed the keeper rate was way better than with the mark II. Guide:Menu and Button Setup for Sony A7 / A9. The latter option still exists however and you may still want to use it: when EyeAF works in real time, it only activates within the focus area selected. The extended values remain the same: pull 50, and push up to 102400 ISO. The mark III model gives you more options to choose from for each custom button (102 versus 62 on the A7R II). Magnification in particular is wonderful to use when you want to fine-tune your focus in still mode because it is much sharper than on the A7R II. I’m not saying you shouldn’t buy one because of this, but I think it’s fair to include this extra piece of information. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. Your personal data won't be recorded until the form has been submitted successfully. The mark III gains an additional setting to reduce flickering under artificial lights but doesn’t work with the electronic shutter, and the burst speed can decrease as well. Guide:Low Light Settings for Sony A7 / A9. Sony has beefed up the A7R IV's buffer by a factor of 1.5x over the A7R II, and this allows consecutive shooting at … The A7R III features the latest version of Sony’s extensive menu system. After a firmware update released in 2016, many Sony cameras including the A7R II started to apply too much noise reduction to exposures longer than 3.2 seconds, even if the NR setting for long exposures was turned off. Buttons, Dials and Interface5. As you can see below, you can still perceive the smallest and least bright stars, whereas they are clearly gone in the A7R II image. a USB intervalometer) to the 2.0 port at the same time. In addition to the 1.5x crop, there are relevant differences concerning the video quality between the two formats. Now lets look at the top view comparison of Sony A7R III and Sony A7R II. Sony has announced the second camera in its third-generation A7 series, the Sony A7 III. Sony A7R II is 32g lighter than the Sony A7R III but we don't think this will make a significant difference. Sony A7R III was introduced to market in October 2017 and Sony A7R II was launched in June 2015. The A7R II isn’t much better so this remains an aspect that Sony should consider improving on future releases. Within the article, there are affiliate links. It’s a solution that has worked just fine up until now but it definitely isn’t as intuitive as the joystick. Sony made some subtle improvements to the colour profiles. We were not asked to write anything about these cameras, nor were we provided any compensation. Cust. Although the magnification of 0.78x remains the same, it has more resolution (3,686k dots) and a faster refresh rate that can be set to 100fps or 120fps (depending on whether you are working in PAL or NTSC mode). Also keep in mind that body weight is not the only deciding factor when comparing two interchangeable camera bodies, you have to also take into account the lenses that you will be using with these bodies. Personally I prefer to keep it set to the Focus Standard setting, which is useful to bring the focus area back to the centre. The A7R II has an OLED panel with 2,260k dots and the refresh rate doesn’t go higher than 60fps. There are only two areas where the A7R III fails to surpass its predecessor: image stabilisation is almost identical on both models, and the grip is just as uncomfortable with large lenses. Tweet. The A7R II can record up to 60fps, whereas the A7R III can go up to 120fps and has the Slow and Quick mode that allows you to select a range from 1fps to 120fps. Well, first, there are a few things that are similar on both models: The Panorama mode has been ditched on the A7R III while Scene Recognition works automatically in Auto mode. Keep reading for a text analysis. Moving on continuous autofocus, Sony claims that the A7R III is two times faster and more precise than its predecessor. The two images below were shot at 1/13s. The question is: should you pay the extra money for the mark III model when we know that the sensor – the star feature of the A7R series – remains the same as its predecessor? Of course this is more valid for the SOOC JPGs than the RAW files as you can easily adjust the results in post production with the latter. Both cameras have a tough magnesium alloy body and are protected against dust and moisture. I haven’t encounter any issues with the A7R III so far. Both cameras are comfortable enough to hold and use with small to medium sized lenses. Actually more than once I even forgot to charge it and I still had enough for the next day (unless I planned to do some intense shooting and 4K recording obviously). It is then conformed to 4K to give you more details without moiré or aliasing. It is ever so slightly larger but is more responsive and softer to press. The A7R II only has one UHS-I slot. In fact it never failed during my tests and it is impressive how the camera quickly resumes tracking the eyes after the subject has turned away momentarily. Well, my job is to try and answer this for you. The selection remains the same (13 Creative Styles in total) but the A7R III has warmer colours in comparison to its predecessor. In this section, we rank and compare Sony A7R III and Sony A7R II for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas. I was quite surprised to see that the mark III’s performance was close to that of the flagship A9 which I was testing at the same time during a football game. The only exception would be if your primary focus is astro-photography: the new camera has less severe noise reduction and doesn’t “eat” as many stars as the A7R II. The A7R II actually gave me a sharp shot at 1/2 second, but my keeper rate was very bad overall. The camera records four pictures and moves the sensor by 1 pixel between each shot. The only disappointment is image stabilisation: the new camera does marginally better with fixed shots (less jittering) and in full frame mode, but overall I don’t find a large difference compared to its predecessor. The video recording button has been moved near the viewfinder where it is easy to reach and operate. In order to make room for the joystick, however, Sony had to eliminate the useful lever you can find on the A7R II. Here again we can see that the mark III model has a small advantage: noise is slightly more uniform and less pronounced from 6400 upwards. Sony A7R IV vs Sony A7R III, the Sony A7R IV camera features major upgrade in the core specification of the camera. Sony A7R II has external dimensions of 127 x 96 x 60 mm (5 x 3.78 x 2.36″) and weighs 625 g (1.38 lb / 22.05 oz) (including batteries). Size & Weight. The most welcome improvement concerns the rear control wheel: it doesn’t move about as freely as the one found on the A7R II and the added thickness improves its precision and tactile feel. In truth, I find it more interesting in video mode because it remains active during the recording. The twin front/rear dials to control the exposure remain very similar, although the one on the rear benefits from added space on the mark III model which makes it easier to rotate. Both the A7R II and the A7R III are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are equipped with a full frame sensor. By comparison, the menu on the A7R II is much more confusing and offers less customisation. Removing anti-alias filter increases the sharpness and level of detail but at the same time, it increases the chance of moire occurring in certain scenes. The A7R III has 425 contrast detection areas, however, meaning that the 25 found on the A7R II have been subdivided into smaller points to improve precision and accuracy. It is a few millimetres deeper and 32g heavier but the width and height remain basically the same. With the A7R mark II, I’ve always found that it is best to stay at around 1/8s or above, and I came to the same conclusion with the A7r III. All of these lenses cover Full frame sensor. You can also use the touch screen, which we will discuss in the next chapter. Plus if the rain gets really intense, I tend to protect my gear unless it’s absolutely necessary to continue shooting. 1. Even when the person doesn’t look directly at the lens, the camera is more reactive at keeping track of the subject. Both Sony A7R III and Sony A7R II has Sensor based Image stabilization which means that all the lenses will be stabilized in these bodies. Sony A7R III was replaced by Sony Alpha A7R IV. Both feature a 23mm eyepoint which is excellent but a little short if you wear glasses as I do. There are minor improvements here and there that make the new camera more interesting for certain purposes but none of these are game-changing in comparison to the previous model. It activates when you half-press the shutter button (or press the back button focus) which means you don’t have to assign it to a custom button anymore. Now it’s the time to answer the question I raised in the introduction: given the lower price of the a7R II, is the A7R III worth the extra money? If you decided to buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. This means slightly less sharp results and the possibility of moiré. The autofocus is probably the aspect I tested more thoroughly than any other on the A7R II. The A7R III has 399 phase detection AF points, the same number as on the A7R II sensor, but the number of contrast detection points has increased by 400 to 425. Beneath the surface, there is the same 42MP full-frame sensor. Sony a7S II vs Sony a7R II | Final Words. Introduction. One way to enhance comfort is to buy either the optional GP-X1EM horizontal grip or the battery grip. Sony likes to keep the design and dimensions of its mirrorless cameras as compact as possible, so unless that changes, it’s hard to imagine how the grip issue can be improved. VIEW COMPARISON ADD MORE. Scores; Specifications; Measurements; Lenses tested; Sony A7R II. Here is the back view size comparison of Sony A7R III and Sony A7R II. The mechanism has been improved on the new camera to reduce vibrations but I didn’t feel a big difference to be honest. Some of what made the A7r II so popular has been inherited by the Sony a7R 3 such as, stunning 4K 30p video capture and 5-axis image stabilisation. There are a three things that set these two cameras apart when it comes to practicality: I’ll talk about the battery in the dedicated chapter at the end of the article, but it’s safe to reveal that it is way better on the new camera because the new NP-FZ100 is larger and offers a longer battery life.
2020 sony a7r ii vs a7r iii